| Community Conscience Advocacy |
| Livable Communities, Bottom-Up
Government & Responsible Civic Action A Proposal and a New Paradigm |
Section
1 ... Overview |
|||||
| Click | |||||
| CCA
Activities Spiritual o Self-development o Personal contact o Preserve community integrity Material o Coordinate support for special needs o Knowledge of public assistance services o Knowledge of tradesmen and merchants o List of gardening resources o Common interest o Common dining o Common workshop o Community gardening o Neighborhood watch o Green space maintenance o Community-wide landscaping o Interfaith dialog o Education o Mind-body development o Fund raising |
o
Sister community outreach o Legalities Legal-judicial o First line interface to courts; personalize application of the law. o Personal contact with officials o Character assessment and testimony o Introduce community considerations into civil litigation o Fine mitigation o Sentencing advice o Support for family of jailed o Legal fund o Formal laws optional Legal-legislative o Bridge community and lawmakers o Lobby for long-term livability o Environmental lobby: connected green space; noise reduction o Spiritual lobby |
|
Below are listed the activities of the CCA grouped into five categories: spiritual, material, common interest, legal-judicial and legal-legislative. A committed, full-time advocate is preferable, but if support funding is not sufficient, it may be necessary for the CCA to work a second job, in which case the advocate duties would have to be handled on a part-time basis. A single CCA should be able to manage about 500 households on his own, depending on the nature of the community, the type of activities, the geography, and the amount of volunteer support. Given enough resources, it's also possible (and desirable) that there be more than one CCA in a community. There could in fact be many people involved in community activities, including others who practiced a spiritual development program, possibly in groups. Regarding accountability, the CCA position is designed to be self-monitoring. The permanence of the community, the stability of the population, the fact that the CCA is committed to residing in that locale – all of this contributes to he or she being available to serve the community basically all the time, and for a very long time (ideally for a lifetime). Also, the close relationship with government officials, the continual interchange between them, and his continual contact with members of the community ensures that people are aware of the CCA's role. Part of the CCA's job is to create and maintain a peer group for himself. In essence he is working to keep others interested in what he has to offer. The overall effect of these activities is to create back-pressure on the governmental bureaucracy. Not destructive pressure, but constructive involvement. It's a natural extension of democratic principles; bottom-up, participatory government by responsible, evolving citizens who create a growing, evolving society. 1. Self-development (a) Maintain a routine:
Maintain his/her self development routine. Coordinate group practice
in the community if there are others who practice the same technique (e.g.,
TM-Sidhi – see section 3.4-9). Maintain a knowledge
of which spiritual and mind-body development methods (meditation techniques
in particular) are well researched, well instructed, and effective. Know
how to contact (possibly through the CCPA) qualified instructors who can
work with community members, and understands what they require of their
students. 2. Personal contact: Establish cordial relations and keep in contact with community members who show an interest in the program. Coordinate neighborhood activities. For those who don't express an interest, at least extend an invitation. The CCA should maintain a confidential database of residents and spouses, families, addresses and contact information, and ideally should have some familiarity with the occupants of every household. Contact should be friendly and informal, but there should also be some intention to understand the character of households and of individuals, with the idea that the CCA might have something positive to contribute to the residents – or conversely, be able to take back something positive from them – material, spiritual, educational. Particular attention should be given to children and young adults in this regard. The exchange of good character traits among community members should be regarded as integral to an overall spiritual development process for the entire group. 3. Preserve community integrity (a) Multigenerational continuity:
Monitor the state of the community – physical and spiritual. Work
to maintain and improve on the minimum community requirements (see Section
2.5). Keep the residential environment attractive
and eminently livable. Encourage community members to stay where they
are when they retire, and to leave their homes to their children (or to
other community members) when they pass away. 3.3 CCA Activities .... Material 1. Coordinate support for
special needs: Is aware of community members that have special
needs: the elderly, children without parents, parents with special needs
kids, parents without partners, women who require support, people with
disabilities, people with particular medical conditions. Depending on
the desires of individuals, the CCA could coordinate help from within
the community if possible, or work personally with folks who needed assistance
with specific tasks. Examples might be tax returns, bill paying, property
maintenance, dealing with local tradesmen, etc. 3.4 CCA Activities ... Common Interest 1. Common dining:
Establish one or more locations where community members can dine together.
This could be a private home, a separate facility, a nearby place of worship
or a restaurant that caters to the community. For meals in private homes,
coordinate community volunteers to buy food, prepare meals and wash dishes. |
| should do the patrolling.
If necessary, activity should be coordinated with local police. When events
occur that should be brought to the attention of the community, the CCA
should alert the neighborhood by e-mail, phone, or flyers. Such alerts
would cover not just criminal activity, but things like pending legislation,
clean-up days, lectures, etc. The CCA should also hold periodic community
get-togethers for informal, informational exchange about matters of common
interest. General
1. First line interface to courts; personalize application of the law (a) Consultation and mediation:
The CCA should serve as a first line interface between the court system
and the community. If there is a legal action being considered by the
government against an individual, the government official (inspector,
prosecutor, investigator, etc.) would contact the CCA in the community
where the party resides before the action
is initiated. An informal consultation should take place. Depending on
the circumstances, the CCA might be able to mediate a settlement. If there
is a minor code violation, for example, the CCA may be able to arrange
for the party to correct the infraction before court action is taken,
or to convince the responsible agency to simply refrain from, or postpone,
enforcing the code in a particular situation. 2. Personal contact with officials The CCA should have consultations with judicial officials, including police, prosecutors, inspectors, commissioners and judges, on a regular basis regardless of whether there is an action pending. A CCA should not have to go to extraordinary lengths to reach such officials – he shouldn't need to file a formal petition to get their attention, or stand in line when a public forum is held. Rather, the officials should seek him out. They should arrange informal discussions between them – on the phone, or preferably in person – at least monthly. Moreover, officials should make a point of paying a personal visit to the communities under their jurisdiction on occasion. Not on official business, not to conduct an investigation, but simply to exchange greetings with CCAs and community members; to shake hands, make eye contact and discuss the state of the community and the state of the world. This should apply to local, state and federal officials alike. (a) Conflict creates confusion:
People who participate in trial proceedings – lawyers, juries –
are often in the dark about which of the parties is telling the truth.
Much time, money and effort is spent in conducting investigations and
taking testimony in order to separate fact from fiction, and the efforts
are not always fruitful. Moreover, in order to justify their own views,
attorneys for both plaintiff and defendant exaggerate their client's position,
leveling irrational attacks on the opponent. The extreme bias of the lawyers
is unavoidable because of the adversarial system of adjudication that
we use. Much confusion arises when such deeply polarized, starkly conflicting
arguments come from people who were presumed to be perceptive and intelligent. (a) Lawsuits mean community failure: Lawyers and court savvy businessmen have no compunction about using the judicial system to settle their disputes. The threat of court action is simply another weapon in their competitive arsenal. But from a community standpoint when a matter must go before a judge, it signifies a breakdown in the normal functioning of social structure. A lawsuit between community members means that the community in general, and the community leaders in particular, have failed. They failed to foresee and prevent an issue from escalating to the level of a courtroom fight, and failed to educate community members about how to resolve differences in a non-contentious manner; how to recognize the greater public good in what they do. "Civil" litigation is actually un-civil. Conflict is the opposite of cooperation, and hence the antithesis of community. All civil judicial conflicts are basically anti-community at heart. (b) CCA mediation: A key aspect of the CCA's role should be to prevent lawsuits from developing in the first place. He or she should offer himself as a mediator in disputes where a community member is involved. An effort should be made to direct people towards settling matters before court action is taken; to maintain community harmony while satisfying the needs of specific individuals. A big part of this involves spiritual training; i.e., education in techniques that refine consciousness. Spiritually developed individuals are less prone towards getting into disputes in the first place – they're more likely to give ground and to compromise than to be inflexible and aggressive. (c) Character testimony: If the parties in a dispute choose not to use the CCA as a mediator, and they are community members who are well known to the CCA, then the court that would hear the civil case should request consultation with the CCA, not to determine the validity of the action, but to collect background information about the character of the people involved. As with criminal cases, the CCA should be given an opportunity to provide character assessments as early as possible in the judicial process, preferably before litigation begins. This testimony should be weighed at least as heavily as other evidence, to the point where a suit could conceivably be dismissed based on what the CCA says about the plaintiff (or conversely, go forward if the character assessment is favorable). It's not that a person of questionable character should be barred from initiating a court action, but the element of character should be recognized as an important factor in the court's determination of the merits of the person's action. Examples: (i) A wealthy landowner in a rural county is disposed towards filing lawsuits when he wants to impose his will on business associates. He gets into a property boundary dispute with a neighbor who is known to be generally congenial and courteous. The landowner utilizes the letter of the law to achieve his ends and does so at every opportunity. The neighbor stays out of courtrooms, and lets an innate sense of fairness direct his decisions and his behavior. Without having to know the details of the case or the specific laws that may be applied, the CCA can testify about the distinct differences in character between the two men, and inform the court in advance that it should be cautious about letting the landowner bully the other guy through the court system, and should instead consider ordering that a mediator – the CCA or someone else – settle the matter. (ii) A woman with a slight mental disability marries a man who is immature about personal relations – often hot-headed, dominating his spouse, and prone to childish jealousy. The man is also an alcohol abuser. The marriage is rocky, but despite this the couple stays together for 16 years, mainly because of the wife's forgiving temperament. The husband views this temperament as mental weakness, an expression of the wife's disability. He is unappreciative of her loyalty. The couple has two young daughters, raised and cared for mainly by their mother. A petty disagreement sets off the husband, who decides he's finally had enough of his wife, and he ambushes her in court – alleging that she assaulted him and is incompetent to raise his children because of her disability. The husband controls the household finances and hires a lawyer. The wife has no money, no family support and no means to defend herself against the legal assault. She is in danger of being ordered out of her own home and separated from her own kids. The CCA should be allowed to step in and testify on the woman's behalf. Based on his familiarity with the household, he could make it clear to the court that the lady's character was distinctly superior to that of the husband's; that the wife was incapable of assaulting anyone, and was more likely to have been assaulted herself; and that it's the husband's competency that should be questioned and not hers. A perceptive judge would then have a better picture of how to handle the matter – possibly ordering the husband to straighten out, get counseling, etc. (d) Neutralize the attorney advantage: It's widely accepted that lawyers and people trained in the law have a natural advantage in the judicial arena, especially when a lawyer is himself a party in a civil matter. The advantage comes not from a sense of the spirit of the law, but from technical knowledge about the letter of the law, the minutia, the tangled legal logic and the formal rules of procedure. (See Section 3.5-9 below, and the discussion in Section 5.2) Ordinary citizens are invariably intimidated by lawyers; afraid to deal with them because of their ability to work the system. But the attorney advantage is actually an illusion; an artifact created by our own collective spiritual weakness. Though there are exceptions, lawyers are in fact generally inferior in their ability to fathom the true spirit and depth of consciousness from which laws arise. Clearly people who must study the written code in order to know how to act are not among society's most enlightened members (this includes, by the way, codes of religion). A more lofty and righteous road is the one taken by people who have discovered the source of natural law that lies within the human spirit and soul. People with greater recognition (and experience) of this spirit are able to conduct themselves in a more spontaneously correct fashion. It's up to the CCA to bring an appreciation for natural law and spontaneous right action into the legal arena. He or she should point out situations where an attorney is not exhibiting the best and highest sentiments from which laws arise, but is instead acting from a technical, legalistic mind-set. This includes judges. They too must be made aware of this very important distinction. Judges must be taught how to grasp the loftier sense of law – divine law – and to give it greater weight than its codified, man-made expression. Attorneys should be put into their proper place in this respect – not to put them down, but to put the purely legal considerations into correct perspective relative to the deeper values, and to hence eliminate the illusionary attorney advantage in the courtroom.
|
|
(a) Appeal through CCA:
Regarding the levying of punitive monetary penalties against citizens,
there are many individuals for whom even a small fine can be a financial
burden. The loss of fifty or a hundred dollars could be a serious hardship
for lower income individuals. The CCA should make an effort to remedy
this inequality. When there is a monetary penalty levied against a community
member, the individual should be given a chance to appeal through his
CCA for a mitigation of the fine based on economic considerations. This
should be the case no matter how minor the infraction, or how small the
fine: parking tickets, moving violations, permits, registrations, misdemeanors,
etc. Based on his knowledge of the needs of the individual and the community,
and the individual's standing in the community, the CCA can recommend
that the fine be reduced or eliminated, or that the person be allowed
to pay the fine in increments over time. 6. Sentencing advice (a) CCA input: If
a community member is found guilty of a crime, the court should allow
input from his CCA before it issues the sentence, provided that the person
desires such input. The defendant or his lawyer should let the court know
that they are seeking sentencing advice from the CCA, and then contact
the CCA to request it. The CCA would indicate to the court by phone or
secure e-mail whether he wants to get involved. If he does, the court
should give him some time to look into the matter – a week or two
perhaps. 7. Support for family of jailed Depending on the circumstances, at his or her discretion, the CCA would coordinate support for the family of individuals who are incarcerated, including extended family members, partners, members of the household and even other community members who might be affected by the loss of the individual in question. Support might take any number of forms – including material, emotional and spiritual. If the family is strongly established within the community, the CCA would endeavor to keep the family together. As a minimum to maintain their residence, perhaps with financial help from a community support fund. 8. Legal fund Depending on resource availability, the CCA should look into establishing a fund to help less wealthy residents with legal expenses. It could be the same fund that is used for fine mitigation. It would be up to the CCA and other community members to determine on a case by case basis what circumstances were appropriate for accessing it. It's possible that the fund could be used for civil as well as criminal cases. With this fund, as with other support funds, community members would be expected to make periodic contributions as their circumstances allow. 9. Formal laws optional 3.6 CCA Activities .... Legal-legislative General
1. Bridge community and lawmakers (a) Fill the gap:
The CCA should bridge the gap between the universe where lawmakers work
and the affairs of the community. He should stay informed about what new
legislation is being considered, particularly as it affects the residents
of his or her community, and should voice general community concerns to
his representative or local council. 2. Lobby for long-term livability (a) Quality of life takes
precedence: It's up to the CCA to educate lawmakers about the ways
that spiritual, material and environmental integrity are beneficial not
just for individual communities but for the municipality as well. The
most important legislative consideration should be that the municipality
respect the integrity and long-term livability of the communities within
it (see Section 4). Changes to the environment
surrounding a community (roads, zoning, logging, new housing, etc.) that
might affect livability should be given careful scrutiny. Livability also
includes economic considerations, such as tax changes, changes in utility
rates, and so on, that affect whether residents can afford to continue
living where they are. But concern for the fundamental quality of life
elements – connection to the earth, quietness, spiritual considerations
– should take distinct precedence over economic arguments. (a) Connected green space:
Of particular concern to communities in the CCA program is that there
be ready access to "connected green space". Not just parks,
but parks that are extensions of the living planet. The CCA should lobby
for the establishment of such space. (See Sections 4.2
and 4.3.) (a) Church/state –
confusion over concepts: Over the past few centuries we in the
West have convinced ourselves that religion and government don't mix.
Lawmakers have constructed legal barriers that are intended to keep church
and state separate. There has unfortunately been much confusion in this
area. The problem lies in the understanding of some basic concepts: namely,
what government is, and what religion is. These are not trivial questions.
Both institutions have deep roots in the evolution of human intelligence.
As it stands, few people, whether they practice religion or not, truly
understand what religion actually is – where it comes from, what
its purpose is, what is its essence. And perhaps even fewer people understand
what government actually is – where it originates, what use it has,
what position it occupies in human society. As with the people who think
of government as a separate entity, independent of individual life, most
of us view religion and religious practices as existing independent of
our daily activity, as if religion occupied a different world, a different
universe. Because of past abuses by church institutions, and the bad behavior
of some current religious groups, when it comes to conducting government,
secular authorities are now wary of anything that relates to religion
and the principles and practices that underlie religion. And because of
the gross and conflictual nature of politics and government, there is
a reluctance among some clergy to expand their role – to take the
step that leads from theology and abstract philosophy to concrete action.
Hence church leaders generally distance themselves from the political
and civic scene. Yet there is a common ground between these fields, and
it's the CCA's job to bring people to it. |
| CCPA
Activities o Identify prospective communities o Program promotion o Review CCA applicants o Assemble spiritual assessment board o Review, recommend instructors, lecturers o Legislative lobby |
|
1. Identify
prospective communities: The CCPA works
within a state or a municipality to identify residential areas that meet
the guidelines for the CCA program (see section 2.5). He or she would
look for areas that are either already suitable, or that could potentially
be made suitable given sufficient cooperation from lawmakers, planners
and property owners.
|